Monday, June 1, 2015

Liberal 5

LIBERAL-5 BACK TO BASICS
Some Liberals complain that the government under funds drug enforcement and wear buttons saying, "Make nails, not jails", but release criminals with revolving door justice.  All too often the criminal is often back out on the street before a cop can finish wear the paper work.  Others wear their politically "correct" ideas and bleeding hearts on and outlawing capitol punishment on their sleeves as a badge of honor.  They are also "bleeding hearts" who oppose capitol punishment because they feel it is not a deterrent.  Rarely will one say it prevents violent criminals from becoming repeat offenders.    
"A society that does not hold people accountable for criminal behavior can be perceived as condoning, or even worse, endorsing such conduct.  In the long run, a society that does obtains personal responsibility will lose it's moral status and it is the urban poor whose lives are being destroyed the most by this loss of a moral sense.  This is not surprising, a system that does not hold people accountable for their violent acts treats them as less than full citizens and such a world where people are reduced to children, or even worse treated like animals without a soul.  There may be a hard lesson here in the face of injustice on the part of society it is natural and easy to demand recompense and or dispensation from conventional norms.  But all too often, doing so involves the individual accepting diminished responsibility for his future.
"The transformation of our criminal justice has had and will continue to have its greatest impact in our urban areas.  It is there that modern excuses for criminal behavior are bound with sub-standard education, faltering families, unemployment, lack of respect for authority because of the deep feeling of oppression.  I have no doubt that the Rice Revolution had a noble purpose, to prevent society from treating blacks, the poor and other minority groups that occupy the urban areas as if they were invisible to the warmth of attention. But the revolution missed a larger point by merely changing their status from invisible, to- victimized.  Minorities and poor are human & capable of folly as well as success."  (Clarence Thomas)
Liberalism’s ruining the country because it’s drifted from the traditional Judeo-Christian family values that made this nation great .  Even Magic Johnson said, "The media only plays up the condom angle & doesn’t push abstinence as the only sure way to avoid contracting AIDS through sex..."
"A 10 year study by the David Barton Research Center took 15,000 quotes from our founding fathers and then boiled them down to the top 3,154 and then found that were all biblically inspired." (Dr. Jay Grimstead, Founder of The-Coalition On-Revival)
Certain Liberals often assume that because someone is a fundamentalist it is a bad thing and that if they are conservative they are automatically closed minded to all, even truth.  Truth is universal.  But the perception of it is not, because perception is subjective, not objective and people often infer what's not implied.  It takes a constant, conscious effort to be an open minded, thinking conservative and not a knee jerk right wing fundamentalist, or allow oneself to become one dimensional, lacking insight for living, or have their intellect negated by anything.  If we do not fight it our perceptions upon reality become altered and start viewing the Bible and God as a "Knight in shining armor come to our emotional rescue." (The Rolling Stones)  Or a "cosmic Santa-Claus." (Al Pecora).  Or the Bible as a crutch to lean upon, a written conformation of our actions and a mask to hide behind. Sadly, the end result is a person who says things such as I pray what clothes to wear in the morning. Neither God nor the Bible, were meant to be misused like this.  "The Bible is a guide book for life." (Harvey Jablon)  And-a dictionary for-living.
At the 40th Anniversary of Brown V. Board of Ed., President Clinton said, "...we have these problems, now what are we going to do about them? There are four things we can do about them & three are wrong: 1) We can attend dinners like this, preach & discuss how great Brown was till the day we die and do nothing about what's going on now.  If so we will lose a whole generation of young people to other courses of action.  Or, we can do what I said.  Elaine mentioned that if you preach venom you get a talk show and if you preach love you get a yawn.  Debroah Tanner, Georgetown U. Prof. has just written a book called You Just Don't Understand. She says we are caught up in a culture of critique where shouting matches shout out constructive conservation and where you only any status if you are slamming someone else & berating them." (B. Clinton)
At Madison Sq. Garden, on 7/16/92, President Clinton said "Frankly, I'm fed up with politicians in Washington lecturing the rest of us about family values.  Our families have values, but our govt. doesn't."
In Memphis, Tennessee, on 11/13/93, referring to Martin King he added, "You did a good job he'd say of exalting people of color into the ranks of the U.S. armed forces and into the very top of our government.  You did a very good job creating a black middle class of people who are really doing well and the middle class is growing more among blacks than others.  You did a good job opening opportunity.
"I did not live and die to see the American family die.  I fought for freedom, but not for the freedom of people to kill each other with reckless abandonment, or for the freedom of kids to have kids.  The fathers abandon them as if they do not amount to anything.
"When the American people have finally come to grips with the accumulated waste of crime & the increase in drugs and the decrease in jobs.
"I think finally that we need to do something about it and there is something for all of us to do.  There are changes we can make from the outside in.  That is the job of the president, Congress, governors, mayors and social service agencies to make.  There is some changes we are going to start making from the inside out, or the others won't matter."
"Consider these cultural markers: The White House will host a conference this week on ways to teach character. Health & Human Services Secretary Donna Schalala now says Dan Quayle was right to condemn Murphy Brown's out-of-wedlock child. Dozens of TV stations are down-playing violence on their news broadcasts & emphasizing 'family sensitive' coverage. Next weekend about 50,000 members of a male Christian group called Promise Keepers will fill a Colorado football stadium to renew their commitment to family & parenthood. Under congressional prodding, the video game is preparing a rating system for concerned parents in time for the holidays. Public support is growing for teen curfews & school prayers. William Bennett's Book of Virtues-a collection of morality sales-is a national best-seller.
"All these signs point to a broad, powerful trend: Many Americans feel mired in a deep cultural recession and are struggling to escape by restoring old-fashioned values to a central place in their lives. It's Woodstock turned on its head 25 years later, a counterrevolution that esteems prayer over pot, self-discipline over self-indulgence, family love over free love. At a time when the economy is performing well, political analysts are stunned to find a cascading sense of public pessimism.  After B. Clinton's inauguration in Jan., 1993, an NBC News/Wall St. Journal poll found that by almost 2 to 1, Americans said the country was headed 'in the right direction.'  Today, the numbers are reversed. Says David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values: 'It ain't "the economy, stupid" anymore.'
"At the core of this pessimism is an increasingly frantic fear among Americans that the country is suffering a moral and spirit decline.  'Parents feel they are in a struggle to raise their own children,' says Senator Joseph Liebermann, a Connecticut Democrat.  'They're competing with powerful forces that are sending very different messages than the ones they want to send.'
"The search for values has always threaded through American life.  From the battle against slavery to the one against alcohol, Americans have used politics to further their deepest spiritual yearnings. In recent elections, Democrats and Republicans have repeatedly wrestled over the banner of moral virtue.  In 1980, Reagan struck a resonant cord with his promise to cherish 'work, home, family and neighborhood.'  In 1992, Clinton seized the high ground, stressing issues like crime and welfare that had been long tenets of the Republican gospel.
"This low-intensity conflict has now erupted into a fire fight.  Shock troops from the religious right have captured state Republican organizations from Texas to Minnesota and fueled a string of GOP election victories.  Their game plan: brand Clinton's policies as immoral-from gays in the military to condoms in schools-and stress his ties to wanton image makers of Hollywood.
"Return fire.  The success of the religious right has alarmed moderate Republicans, who fear the party will be dragged out of the mainstream.  Democratic leaders, meanwhile, petrified that recent Republican triumphs foreshadow a ferocious counterattack. Clinton complained angrily to a radio station about R. Limbaugh, a frequent megaphone for Conservative Republican themes.  And Rep. Vic Fazio, head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, assailed the 'fire breathing Christian radical right' with this strategy in mind: aggravate the split between conservative and moderate Republicans while frightening liberals into action.
"Each party is trying to demonize the other.  Republicans are making Surgeon Gen. J. Elders their poster child, arguing that her views favor sex education and her willingness to consider legalizing drugs is emblematic of the Democratic Party.  Democrats are doing the same with TV evangelist Pat Robertson, claiming his hostility toward to gays, feminists, and abortion reflects the entire GOP. Republicans want voters to remember the 1972 Democratic convention, when the party conveyed a liberal elitism hostile to middle-America. Democrats focus on the 92 Republican convention, when advocates of a cultural war came across as smugly self-righteous.
"The energy and emotions spanning this struggle flow from the real experiences of ordinary Americans.  Many are baby boomers, now approaching middle age and discovering that the 'do your thing' ethic of their youth does not work as a guide for child rearing.  Says Gary Bauer, head of the Family Research Council: 'Having a child is an incredibly conservatizing event.'
"Parents mourn the loss of familiar neighborhoods and extended families that once provided a safety net against danger.  'Wanting a benign environment for child raising-that's what this is all about,' says Blankenborn.
"But family structure is changing as well.  The Census Bureau reported last week that the birthrate for unwed mothers has jumped 82% in the past 10 years, and the number of divorced Americans has quadrupled since 1970.  That means more kids are being raised with less supervision and fewer resources, putting them at a greater risk of delinquency.  Even in affluent homes, notes political scientist Thomas Mann, the divorce rate leads to 'new arrangements, multiple parents, kids shuffling around, and a lot of guilt.'

"End of optimism.  Parents fear their children will not live as well as they do, and John K. White, author of The New Politics of Values, says: "Their- optimism and faith in the future are being called into question.' Many parents must work extra and odd jobs to survive, and a recent study of family values concludes: 'Lack of time together is the greatest threat to the American family.' The stress level in many families has been compounded by the loss of jobs in the defense industry and a general uneasiness caused by corporate downsizing and global competition.  To some, this demonstrates a basic tension between free markets and family values.
"Even stable families feel besieged by hostile forces.  For some it is public schools, seen by many conservatives as hotbeds of secular licentiousness. For others its movies and music, t.v. shows video games that sell casual sex and incessant violence.  Bennet, a possible Republican presidential candidate, describes the reaction as a 'national head shaking.'  He says parents are asking: 'What's going on?'
"President Clinton tried to answer with a series of government programs: family and medical leave, an earned income credit to boost poor families income and a welfare reform plan emphasizing work and responsibility.  But there is a growing recognition among liberals that government can solve few of these core issues bothering Americans. Matt Freeman of People for the American Way, a liberal activist group, says: 'We're portrayed as lobbying money and programs at problems, but we do not address the anger and sense- of moral vacuum people are- feeling.'
"Clinton's ability to fill that vacuum has clearly been hampered by accusations of personal misconduct, but William Galston, his domestic policy adviser, says Clinton is determined to try.  In Galston's view, the 'stability of the 50's was purchased at a great cost'-lack of opportunities for women, bias against minorities.  While liberalism demolished those barriers it went too far the other way, undermining all authority and glorifying individual fulfillment over family obligations.  The question now is whether or not politicians will seek common ground, a synthesis combining the great themes in American values: personal and social responsibility, individualism and community, freedom and sacrifice? If not, the cultural warfare will only worsen."  (U.S. News & World Report, 8/1/94, p.26, America's New Crusade, Steve Roberts)

"The fraying of America's social fabric is fast becoming a national obsession.  Three out of every four Americans think we are moral and spiritual decline.  Two out of three think the country is seriously off track.  Doubts about the president's character decreased his poll ratings 15 points.  Social dysfunction haunts the land; crime and drug abuse, the breakup of the family, declining academic performance and graffiti.  Senator Dan Monyihan calls it 'defining deviancy down'.  We once found it repugnant, but it has now become an acceptable part of life.
"We seem to have lost the balance between societal rights and freedom. There are daily confrontations with authority figures: black v. white power structure, women v. patriarchy, feminists v. feminism, gays v. homophobia, children v. parents, mothers v. matrimony, fathers v. child support, churchgoers v. church, student v. universities.  Instead of a cultural of common we have one of constant complaint.  Everyone is a victim.  The have-nots claim victimization by the haves.  Crime is sanctioned by 'bleeding heart liberals' under the premise of an unhappy childhood, the validity is debatable.  Industriousness, thrift, self-discipline and commitment are now fond memories of yesteryear.
"The combined effect of these sicknesses, rooted in phony doctrines of liberalism, has been to tax the nation's optimism and sap its confidence in the future. It is the young who are strikingly venerable.  They are being deprived-like no previous generation -of the emotional comfort and moral nurturing provided by the traditional family. Instant gratification is the new order of the day.  Personal impulses, especially sexual, are constantly stimulated by popular music and TV, with other mass media not media not far behind.  TV and music often seem to honor everything a true American resents-violence, infidelity, drugs, drinking-and despises all that it embraces-religion, marriage, respect for authority.  No wonder it is difficult to sustain parental values and continuity.
"Behind the popular culture lies a capitalist system whose development now also contributes to the erosion of family and community.  The individual flourishes best in small neighborly communities based on the traditions and habits of the family, the church, township, where trust, intimacy and cooperation are prized.  But the ideal of the individual in the community is constantly threatened by a market that seeks mobility of labor and capitol. We extol the virtues of self discipline, hard work, patience and personal responsibility, but market capitalism requires to- be -a consumer first, buy now, pay –later, and enjoy. Altruism's discouraged in a culture of acquisitive individualism.
"There is a great yearning in the country to provide our national life & institutions with a larger moral dimension: The success of the movie Forrest Gump lies in its appeal to American's decency.  Redemption has to start with TV & education.  Children spend more time before the TV then at school.  Society must find a way for TV to have a bigger purpose than making money.  Consistent with our nation's commitment to freedom of the press, the president should establish a national commission to review the impact of TV. and suggest how it might play a more constructive role in society.  Education is an economic imperative since business requires greater skills and sophistication from its employees.  But it is also a moral imperative.  Everyone who could benefit should have the opportunity not just for learning how to find substance in knowledge.
"The nation's hunger for a public commitment to social and moral betterment is not a simple nostalgia for the greater simplicities of yesteryear; the clock cannot go back. It is a profound and anxious desire to arrest decay.  But if the dysfunctional trends continue, that anxiety will turn to fear, and panic. And when fear comes t dominate social policy, reason and tolerance are at risk. This is our predicament." (U.S. News & World Report, 8/8/94, Where Have All Our Values Gone?, by Moriter Zuckerman, p. 88)
Liberalism forgot that decadence caused the Roman Empire & can happen here too if we let it. Conservatives must know "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing!" (Edmund Burke) And that "reason & experience both forbid us to expect the national morality to prevail to the exclusion of religious principles. There can be no national morality if there is no religious principle!" (G. Washington)
SEPARATION  OF  CHURCH  &  STATE
Many libs oppose prayer in public schools as a violation of the separation of church and state.  If students hold Bible meetings after school and aren't infringing upon anyone else's rights shouldn't they be allowed to?  I wish they were as determined to keep drugs and condoms out of schools as they are the Bible.
Many Liberals try to overturn laws opposing their agenda because they know that "the constitution is made of wax, so as it can be molded & shaped." (T.Jefferson) And that separation of church & state means freedom to worship individually & not have to follow a national religion or go to a state church as they did. In England. It was never intended to deny anyone the freedom to worship when, or where they pleased, so long as they did not impose upon anyone else's right not to. If prayer groups want to assemble after school in a classroom shouldn't they be allowed to? As long as there tests in school there will be prayer.
History shows what America was like before we lost sight of the values that we once held so high.  Many people do not want to admit that hate is not a family value and counter productive. Sadly, few know that ".the propitious smiles of heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which heaven itself has ordained." (G. Washington, first Inaugural Address of a U.S. President, 1789) Or that, "God who gave us life, gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed convictions that are a gift from God?" (T. Jefferson) These were the principles upon which our great nation was founded, now "even a kid can write to the Washington D.C. Dept. of Human Services, Commission of Public Health, Agency for HIV and AIDS to request a free booklet they publish on how to have oral sex with a man." (Jerry Farwell)  This is what the tax dollars of decent Americans are paying for in a recession no less.  Then we are told that we need to raise taxes. Programs like must be eliminated if we have any morals and values left.  Not to mention getting our heads above water financially.  
Liberals are often atheists who compensate/compound ignorance with arrogance by being atheists.  We must remember that "man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants & our constitution was made for only a moral, religious people & is wholly inadequate for any other gov’t." (Ben Franklin)  We mustn’t forget that civil laws are often based on religious laws, like the Sixth & Eighth Commandments prohibiting murder & stealing.
Many liberals oppose religion because they are atheists. Bill Bennet, of Empower America made a good point.  He said, "I returned to Washington, D.C. the other day and read the front page of the Post: 'Mayor Kelly wants to call out the National Guard due to the city's exploding murder rate;' Senator Packwood is holding onto his diaries, which contain accounts of various sexual escapades on Capitol Hill; and I read about a sting on Montgomery County Liquor Stores, where the problem is underage drinking-- I still say there are people who believe that the greatest threat to the well being of the Republic is too much religion.
"We are in a race between civilization and catastrophe.  We've recorded murder and violent crime rates; huge increases in births to unwed mothers; education decline; broken families; and a president who has established a record for broken promises.    
"All of this, & we’re told the very religious are to be feared. Religion’s on the side of civilization; more people ought to begin to recognize it."  
MARRIAGE,  LOVE  and  MATERIALISM  
A major problem with Liberalism today is that it devalues God, by devaluing His advice, love and ideologies like marriage.  People should seek a best friend to share their life, not a maid, cook, or Santa Claus. When thinking of love and marriage I feel that "...love and marriage go together like the horse and carriage. Let me tell you brother, you can't have one without the other..." (Sinatra, Love and Marriage)  Marriage should be designed like a house using friendship: (best friends are one soul in two bodies) and love as the foundation! Acceptance, appreciation, communication, compromise eliminates many irreconcilable differences, consideration, devotion, faithfulness, forgiveness, honesty, honor, loyalty, luck, patience, perseverance, reciprocation, respect, team work, trust, and understanding of ourselves & each other because it's like a bank: you exchange hate, indignation, anger, anxiety, frustration, resentment, etc. for compassion, pity, sympathy, empathy, forgiveness, etc. And the peace to accept the things you cannot change. It is also like a washing machine: you put in hate, anger, anxiety, frustration and resentment. You wash them away and have compassion, pity, sympathy and ---forgiveness.  And the peace to accept the things you cannot change. These are the bricks. And the courage and determination to stand united despite anyone, or anything is the mortar combining it all.  Couples should create a haven: "...come to me and I will give you shelter from the storm..." (Donna Summer, Come To Me) This is very difficult, but worth the effort. If we do not try things because they are hard we would not accomplish much.  Nothing worthwhile is easy, if it were we would not appreciate it.  Sadly, so many people are unwilling to work at their problems and do not realize that -divorce is the wrecking ball that destroys all too many lives!

Some of the major problems today, is- that we all too often forget the importance of family.  We allow materialism to become so important that we forget important things like love and happiness are what life is all about.  These are spiritual in nature.  They should never be demeaned, measured, or replaced by money.  People should not marry someone they feel they can live with.  They should marry someone they feel that they cannot live without.  A major cause of divorce today is "people date and are not really themselves: they are on their best behavior.  Then they both fall in love with an illusion and when reality sets in they wonder what to the person they fell for." (Paul Broer)  "On a first date people should wear a t-shirt and jeans and be themselves." (Joy Brown, Ph.D.)
Many Liberals know that we are not a theocracy and materialism helped make us an industrial giant.  But sadly, society all too often uses money as the yardstick to measure happiness, love, people, security, and success.  Materialism has replaced spiritualism.  Like many cultural aspects it is reflected in music seriously and satirically: "Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz?  My friends all drive Porches.  So, oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz?  Oh Lord, won't you buy me a diamond ring?  Oh Lord, won't you buy me a color TV....?" (Janis Joplin) And "...love is quite continental; but diamonds are a girl's best friend..." (M. Monroe) But "money can't buy me love." (The Beatles) "What is it if a man gains the whole world, but loses- his-soul." (Jesus Christ)
Love should also be free & giving like sand, courage & determination are cement mix & water: combining them enables eternal endurance. But withdraw any element and the compound is incomplete; therefore inadequate and insufficient. The sand, like love slips through your fingers, blowing away in the wind while we watch helplessly, knowing nothing can be done to solidify the sand, or love.
Yet, despite this "many people are too independent, do not know what they want, and do not appreciate what they have, or had." (Peter Moreo and Howard Asinoff) Many men joke about love and marriage.  One made up a poster: "WANTED: GOOD WOMAN...Must Be Able To Clean, Cook, Sew, Dig Worms And Clean Fish.  Must Have Own Boat, With Motor. Please Send Picture Of Boat And Motor." (Office Humor II) While people have joked about it for years we should seek a Soul Mate to compliment, not complete us, as we should be independent adults before marriage & not need someone to bring us happiness, fulfillment, or purpose.
Love is also like a magnet: many functional people gravitate toward it, while many are repelled by it. The primary motivation is fear of abandonment, betrayal, commitment, failure, intimacy, rejection, success and the unknown.  Love is also like a swimming pool: if you jump in you soon warm up.  But many people become spectators and bystanders in life because they don’t realize that if you dip your toe & feel it is too cold today, you’ll return tomorrow, you’ll never go in.  They also wonder "...who needs a heart, when a heart can be broken...?"  (Tina Turner, What's love got to do with it?)  Yet, many still delude themselves into thinking money is the key to happiness, compounding and compensating ignorance with arrogance.
Being in love is great because you are so happy "the tail wags the dog." Many of us fear being a fool for love and should feel that "it is everybody's God given right to make a fool of themselves for the person they love once!  Most of us do it, we're not proud of it!!  But we do it anyway!!! (Tom Barrecca)  It is a part of life, and you do not fully comprehend it until you have loved and lost it at least once. One should also remember that "in a relationship one of the most important things is sharing the same values." (Connie Pizzero)  And the best things in life really are free. Even the almighty dollar that people all too often worship, live, die and kill for says, "In God We Trust."  Maybe we should consider seeking His aid to help attain one of our ultimate goals: a Soul Mate.
You can say much of the same about those who substitute sex for love.  As sex and pregnancy can be a blessing, or a curse, meaningful, or meaningless. The choices are obvious. Unfortunately, it’s all too easy to make wrong ones in life. "Sex without love satisfies our physical needs, but not our emotional ones!" (Dave Leifer)  "...I love u are the three most beautiful words you'll ever hear..." (Stevie Wonder, I Just Called To Say I Love You)  But it is a fairy tale to think that "...love will keep us together..." (Captain & Tenile)
Often relationships end and that is a natural part of life.  During, and for sometime after a breakup, especially if she has someone new, rejection is often devastating, even if It is not necessarily anyone's fault!  It often was not meant to be and things usually work out for the best, if we give them a chance! Unfortunately, hindsight is so much clearer than foresight.  To know that she does not care to know you anymore, no longer loves you, may never have loved you, and is with someone else is very often harder to accept than death. Unfortunately, many people feel that substitution and denial are the solution. It is not!  We need time to grieve and make peace over things.  Being promiscuous often make things worse because when we make love casually we often leave a piece of our soul in a temporary place.  "It is like losing a finger: you are unable to go on in life but there are scars." (Katy Carro)  They can be permanent if we do not work them out.  Sadly, "people all too often are willing to give their bodies, but not their hearts, and we can't wear condoms on our hearts." (Howard Asinoff, N.D.)
Unfortunately, one is often temporarily emotionally devastated & permanently scarred.  You cross the fine line from love to hate & carry emotional baggage like denial, substitution, symbolism & transference (finding a scapegoat & sacrificial lamb to unload our hatred for woman, especially the one who left you on to) for years into new relationships seeking serenity & not knowing the deep sadness that compounds with it.  It is hard to make peace because some spend a lifetime searching for love and never find it, to find it and discover that it does not count enough to conquer anything, much less anything is very hard to digest. Although- some -people say that "love helps you over the rough spots" (Arnita Finerson).
Fortunately many people find love more than once. Sex & love -are- a compound & must be fulfilled simultaneously. If they are not, the compound is inadequate, incomplete & insufficient. They always were, & always will be as human nature does not change because the soul is everlasting. Some people think a big marital problem is that "men should be loving leaders, not dictators .We- should be caretakers, & nurturers. So their wives will submit & follow them. All women want kind, gentle leadership. Some rebel against it, some admit it & some deny it. Lesbians & feminists are trying to become the man they're meant to marry." (Howard Asinoff) Lead is not a synonym for abuse, control, dictate, dominate, intimidate, rule, nor anything like that! Husbands must prove their sincerity, trustworthiness, righteousness, etc. so their wife will follow of her free will because she is convinced that he’s doing what is best for them. She’s his right hand. Unfortunately, many people don’t realize that happiness is not always possessing, sometimes it being apart.
Some might say that, "life is a paradox because people are complex creatures.  Yet we all have simple needs & it often takes so little to satisfy them.  We're like snowflakes: we are all a bit different, but we come from and go to the same place & all have the same basic needs."  (Scott Chaiet)

Not that they would ever admit it, but some liberals care only about money to fund their agendas and not the country.  I feel that "if we love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude, better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.  We ask not your council, or your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hands of those who feed you.  May your chains set lightly upon you. May prosperity forget you were ever our- countrymen." (Samuel Adams)  And that even a Liberal like R.F.K. said, "We will find neither national purpose nor personal satisfaction in a mere continuation of economic progress, in an endless amassing of worldly goods.  We cannot measure national spirit by the Dow Jones average, nor national achievement by the Gross National Product..." (R.F.K., To Seek A Never World, Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1967, p. 264).

Few Liberals do not realize that religion must not be confused with spirituality.  As some have one, the other, both, or neither.  "A part of man's nature is a void in his soul which cannot be filled with anything, but spirituality." (St. Augustine)  A big problem today is people try to fill it with materialism and are unaware that it becomes a vacuum and the more you try fulfilling it that way, the more it grows.  They then find themselves unable to exit a vicious, self perpetuating cycle.  Sadly, few realize this, no matter how intelligent and of those who do, few posses the courage and wisdom to escape.  They eventually retrospect upon a empty and unhappy life.

IGNORANCE
Some conservatives have become cynical and apathetic today. They must get involved in issues. Many do not even vote. They do not feel it counts issues do, or affect them. Hopefully, before it is too late, people will see that "one of the penalties of refusing to partake in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors." (Plato) "In 1988 an election study was conducted by the University of Michigan. A random sample was asked to identify the political office held by some of the most prominent American and world leaders. The results were 71% knew Gorbachev was President of the Soviet U. Only 69% knew Kennedy was a U.S. Senator, 60 knew M. Thatcher was Prime Minister of England, 39 knew George Schultz was Secretary of State, 37 knew Yassar Arafat was leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, 14 knew Jim Wright was Speaker of the House, four knew William Rehnquist was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court." (American Government textbook, 6:220) "A major problem with Americans today is ignorance, as they are 'dumbing down'" (Sen. Dan Monihan). If people are not motivated, and our system is not simplified to be more like England's: a five week campaign for prime minister, nothing can be done to "stop the powers of few from ruling on the labor of the many." (T. Jefferson)

I write this because I, like so many others, have talent, on loan, from God.  It is not easy and lonely at the top, but someone has to do it, so I figured it might as well be me.  Besides, I get to intellectually stimulate, amuse and challenge myself and my readers and get to gore a lot of oxen all in one story.  Not to mention raising Liberal people's blood pressure when they read this.  The Jew, New Yorker and Republican in me just cannot resist such a bargain.  We all must denounce wrongs, for those who "sin by silence when they should protest...and make cowards out of men." (A. Lincoln)
Lincoln was a Republican a party Liberalism says is for the rich, apathetic toward civil rights and minorities. Anyone thinking that should remember that it was Lincoln who freed the slaves. If not for Republicans, would we have had a Civil War, and would slavery have been abolished?  Up until F.D.R. was elected in 1932, most blacks were Republicans because Lincoln freed the slaves and was a Republican.  
PEACE  V. FREEDOM  
Many Liberals since the 1960's speak of peace.  But have no response when asked "what is peace without freedom, is it truly peace? And do we have the freedom to be different? I work hard to be different from most people & consider myself a maverick & a patriot for having the temerity & perseverance to stand by my convictions, especially these days. I know that America is the best country, but still want to improve it. But I am well aware that "in the beginning of change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated & scorned. But, when his cause succeeds, then the timid join him, for then it cost nothing to be a patriot." (Mark Twain)  Still I choose to do so anyway, because these are my beliefs & "above all else to thine own self one must be true!" (Shakespeare)  For if we do not overcome the fear to do so we will be encircled & encompassed by fear. It then becomes entrenched within, enveloping & engulfing us. We wind up a slave it to it with the chains in our head like "the elephant, who as- a baby had a rope tied to her foot to keep her from running away.  When she grows up she doesn’t realize that she cannot break the rope therefore it’s now in her head, not on her foot." (Howard Asinoff)  We must chose between a "fierce enemy always ruling, or a formidable enemy about to retreat." (Jim Dobson)  We must face them!  If we do not, we end up seeking peace at any price, even freedom & the pursuit of happiness. We must never allow the fear of loss to outweigh the desire for gain.
It is a fact that by nature people are either, fighters, flighters, or floaters. We’re a lot like genes: dominant & recessive. Those in the middle are floaters. One cannot go through life being a flighter, waiting & hoping for our desires. We must be prepared to fight for our needs, as life is Social Darwinism.

There is an old Russian poem that discusses being apathetic for peace, instead of being strong and caring enough to speak out for freedom: "Do not fear your enemies; for they can only destroy you.  Do not fear your friends; they can only betray you.  Fear the apathetic; for their silence condones all the atrocities in the world." (Unknown)  In W.W. 2 Pastor Nemoi referring to the Nazis said, "When they came for the Jews I did not say anything because I was not a Jew.  When they came for the Communists I did not say anything because I was not a Communist.  When they came for me there was no one left to say anything."

We must not choose peace for fear of failure as "failure can be a back door to success." (Howard Asinoff)  If at first you do not succeed, try, try, again. There are other consequences we must endure in life no matter what we do. But one of the worst is  a missed opportunity.  People are haunted for years by their past because they lack "the Serenity to accept the thing they cannot change." (St. Francis)  And now realize that they are walking down the road of missed opportunities would, could and should have, maybe had I done this, or that, things might have been different.  They now know that the serenity of knowing that you did all you could is "the rod and staff and that comfort you as you walk through the valley of the shadow of death." (Plasms, 23:4)

Also that peace without the freedom to pursue happiness is worthless because it is not a true peace.  Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty, or give me death!"  The U.S.A. was born because heroes like him choose to die standing for freedom rather than live groveling for peace at any price!  They knew that "...every form of refuge has its price..." (The Eagles)  And that peace for freedom was too high a price to pay and "...sometimes freedom is just a word for nothing left to lose: cause baby without freedom you ain't got nothing..." (K. Kristofferson, Me and My Bobby McGee)  And that it is "better to die on your feet than live on your knees." (Albert Camus, The Rebel)  They made the freedom to pursue happiness a guaranteed and inalienable human right under the U.S. Constitution.  One, like many, that Americans all too-often- take- for granted because they do not realize that "if there is no struggle there is no progress.  Those who profess to favor freedom and yet renowned the controversy, are people who want crops without plowing the ground." (Sir Fred Douglas)  Many strong people find the servitude that accompanies peace at any price so repugnant that they feel it is "better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven." (John Milton, Paradise Lost, Book 1)

CENSORSHIP and ACCEPTANCE

When discussing politics with a liberal they can't believe I'm serious, they laugh. When I ask what's so funny? They say, "I don't believe you. You can't be serious? You should be a comedian, not a writer!" They are often shocked to hear that I don't want to censor them. And that I accept them, despite our differences. I know that acceptance is a two way street: we must give it to get it! I also have enough faith in the truth and righteousness of my beliefs that I don't need to censor. If we dare censor anyone we not only violate the first Amendment, but once we start, where do we draw a line? We become the tyrants so many died defeating. Then it is only a small step before the "thought police" knock down our doors to take us away, never to be seen, or heard from again.  Many liberals claim to be enlightened, open minded, accepting and tolerant of opposing views. Unfortunately, "all too often when you scratch beneath the surface of a Liberal you find a Fascist!" (Norm Brookes) "It's like trying to fight city hall!" (Mike Petrizzo) Ironically, "beneath it all we are all human and that's scary!"(Tom Hodgson)

LEGALIZING- DRUGS
Many liberals believe in the legalizing drugs as a means of eliminating the "black market" & therefore all related crime & save a fortune on law enforcement. While this sounds good, there’ll be a "black market" for kids. The gov’t will not sell drugs to minors & no decent parent will buy it for them.

Liberal 4

LIBERAL-4 AIDS, SEX, CONDOMS, EDUCATION and KIDS
The topic of sex education and AIDS is a little controversial to say the least. Surprisingly, President Clinton's AIDS Policy Coordinator Kristene Gebbe said, "Many people need to change their behavior because it is spreading the disease. They're making bad choices everyday. That means blunt talks with people of all ages.  That's been hard for our society to deal with. We need more blunt conversations, no matter how uncomfortable."
Yet, few liberals admit that AIDS is a direct result of a philosophy which condones and promotes a lifestyle that includes promiscuity for both homosexuals and heterosexuals. Liberalism's answer to prevention is distributing condoms in N.Y.C. high schools at taxpayers expense, in the middle of a recession. Former Mayor Dinkins said he may layoff teachers due to the recession. Yet the N.Y.C. Board of Ed. has money to distribute condoms in high schools. Instead of teaching kids to say NO they are teaching them to KNOW how to have "SAFE SEX."
They say that using a condom is "SAFE SEX." What guarantee is there that kids will use them? Condoms have been available for years and kids have not. The Food and Drug Administration does not even consider condoms a birth control device due to their ineffectiveness. Who would knowingly have sex with a person who has AIDS, even if they were wearing a condom? We cannot always visually tell if a person has AIDS, leaving abstinence as the only sure way of not contracting it through sexual intercourse.
Some Liberals favor distributing condoms in high school because kids are going to have sex anyway. Some say things such as, "Kids are going to have sex whether or not condoms are distributed in high schools because they're too embarrased to buy them. My teenage daughter is too embarrased to buy Kotex, but that doesn't stop her from menstrating." (Michelle Schlien) I wonder what would happen if some of these kids get pregnant, or contract AIDS? In the era of frivolous lawsuits they can sue N.Y.C., its Board of Education, the former Chancellor Joe Fernandez and the manufacturer for knowingly distributing a defective and unsafe item to minors. A lawyer can say, "the failure rate of condoms is 14.2 %" (1992 American Medical Association report).  Yet despite this potential major lawsuit former Chancellor Fernandez still distributed condoms in high schools.  Former U.S. Surgeon General, Dr. Joycelyn Elders supports the idea and in an interview said, "We don't need to give kids a 'plumbing lesson' they already know that."  The reason they know so much is "the media constantly bombards kids with the message that casual sex is o.k." (Donna                )
In addition to that, some people such as Joe Fernandez, are also spreading the "gospel" of liberalism by pushing to include a curriculum called Children Of The Rainbow in public schools. He suggested condoning a gay lifestyle by making books like Heather Has Two Mommies and Daddy's New Roommate recommended reading for first graders to teach them values. Are teachers hired to teach, or be a surrogate parent, social worker and family counsellor? Should their job be teaching the basic skills needed to function in life, or about racism, multi-culturalism and homosexuality. Some people object to prayer and saluting the flag in school because they feel that it does not belong in school. Why it is acceptable to teach all these things despite parental objections?
Shouldn't it be a parent's decision as to what their kids are taught in public schools since their taxes fund them? Parents would send kids to parochial school if they want them taught values. Isn't it a parent's job to teach values at home because environment is a major factor in a child's development. In psychology it is called Tabula Rasa: that is Latin for blank slate. "Give me your children and I'll rule your nation." (Karl Marx)
Since we know how important environment is to a child's development gay couples should not be allowed to adopt kids.  While heterosexuality does not automatically make a good parent, and unfortunately all too many "straight" parents are persecutors rather than protectors at least they are starting off on the right foot.  Being gay automatically starts couples off "behind the 8 ball" and they have an extra obstacle to overcome.  Unfortunately like many people with problems they are often in  denial and rarely are willing to admit that they even have a problem, much less willing to seek a cure.    
Meanwhile, a Liberal like Joe Fernandez, who said, "I want parental involvement", pulled rank when opposed by school board #24 in Ozone Park, N.Y. by suspending them. Why? Because they opposed their kids being taught about homosexuality. If kids are going to be taught about sex shouldn't they be taught abstinence too? Isn't it probable that he acquiesced on this issue because he wanted to be the national secretary of education for President Clinton, or be re-elected and all the negative publicity is harmful? Unfortunately for him it was too late; his contract was not renewed by N.Y.C. Hopefully sending a very loud message to all. People should realize that "the philosophy of the school room in one generation will be that of the government in the next." (Lincoln)
"We must help kids by setting role models for personal and moral stability." (Jerry Farwell)  "The education of youth should be watched with the most scrupulous attention.  Education forms the moral characters of men and morals are the basis of government education should be the main care of political regulations; for it is much easier to introduce and establish an effectual system for preserving morals, rather than correcting them by penal statues, the ill affect of a bad system...  The goodness of a heart is of more consequence to society than an elegance of manners...  The education of youth... lays the foundations on which both law and Gospel rest for success." (Noreal Webster)

Once we start condoning irresponsible behavior where do we draw a line? Junior and senior high schools could set up lounges for kids to use condoms since they are going to have sex anyway. Should schools distribute cigarettes and alcohol since kids are going to smoke and drink anyway? Schools could offer adult fun meals containing condoms.
This is a primary reason why we are losing an economic and industrial war to Japan. Not to mention the fact that we have become such a sex orientated society that we use sex to sell everything from popcorn to perfume and cars to clothes. You name it and sex is probably used to sell it. In Europe it is so bad that you can rarely tell what is being sold. Sadly, there is a ring of truth to the criticisms their prime-minister made about Americans being ignorant, that is why it hurt. They know that a good education is a foundation in life and invaluable for success. That is why they teach their kids about math instead of homosexuality. We do not need it in the classroom. Neither a 15, nor 5-year-old should be taught about sex in school. Isn't it bad enough that kids today are told that irresponsible sex is fine by distributing condoms in N.Y.C. high schools for safe sex and that a 15% failure rate of condoms is safe. "If 100 people were on an airplane and the pilot said that 15 would die before landing, I bet everyone would evacuate instantly!" (Rush Limbaugh) Air travel is a risk we must face in daily living; being sexually permissive is not!

Another reason Japan's Prime Minister was right when he accused Americans of being ignorant in comparison to Japan is that "An eighth grader in Japan knows more Math than an average U.S. M.B.A. graduate. An average 17 year old American knows 1/2 as much as Math as an average Swede the same age.  Homework in Japan is two hours a day v. 1/2 in the U.S. Japanese students have 240 school days a year v. 180 in the U.S. By the time a Japanese student graduates high school, she has had equal class room time as a U.S. college graduate." (Richard D. Lamm, "Crisis: The Uncompetitive Society", in Global Competitiveness: Getting the U.S. Back on Track, ed. Martin K. Starr, N.Y: W.N. Norton, 1988, p.25)  
In N.Y.C. then Chancellor Fernandez publicly promised private industry to retrain any grads that were fired due to illiteracy.  He did not say why, or how they graduated.
Yet another problem with our education system is that "20-30 millon adults cannot read, write, or add well enough to function effectively at work."  (Joe Berger,"Companies Step in Where the Schools Fail", N.Y. Times, 9/26/89, A-1)  Unfortunately, "U.S. schools are graduating students who even lack the skills to fill existing assembly line jobs, let alone the sophisticated new jobs that increasingly dominate the economy." (Ed Fiske, "Impending U.S. Jobs 'Disaster': Work Force Unqualified to Work", N.Y. Times, 9/25/89, A-1)  Perhaps it is time the U.S. reinvents education?
In 1990, in N.Y.C., the Board of Education Chancellor Dr. Joe Fernandez had teachers talking to kids in street lingo they read in booklets that were distributed containing various terms.
Liberals who believe in raising corporate taxes must realize the fact that Japan is beating us economically. Understandably, "taxes are the price we pay for being a civilized society." (Sir William Perry)  But raising taxes is only going to put a bigger financial hardship on business than already exists and cause more unemployment.  U.S. business needs to refocus so that it can no longer be said that "the failure of U.S. competitiveness is largely a failure to manage for quality, while the key to Japanese success is an almost compulsive and fanatical attention to managing for quality." (A. Blanton, Godfrey, and Peter J. Kolesar, "Role of Quality in Achieving World Class Competitiveness", in Global Competitiveness: Getting the U.S. Back on Track, ed. Martin K. Starr, N.Y: W.W. Norton, 1988, p.216)

Although our education system is outcome based, one of the results and problems Liberalism is causing is that "there is currently a fire storm raging in this country regarding the way we teach our kids history.  The result is a new multi -culturalism seeking to re-write history.  I regret that there were no Jews on the Mayflower.  But a fact, is a fact.  The reality is that the early settlers were European and Americans share a common heritage of cultural values, language and traditions based upon England and European roots.  Should we be rewriting history to make people feel good? That's not history, it's Psychiatry!" (Ed Koch)
"The aim of education, as many of our campuses now see it is no longer truth, it's political transformation...there are no truths to pursue, only political purposes. In a 1989 Gallup poll 175 of 700 college seniors did not know Columbus landed in the West Hemisphere before 1,500 and most couldn't identify the Magna Carta." (Dr. Lyn Cheeny, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities)
Unfortunately, education in the U.S. is not what it was. "Historically 100 of the first 104 American Colleges were founded by Christians. Harvard was 100 before not having a professor who was not a Minister. Brown was the first Baptist College in America. Dartmuth was started as a Missionary outreach program to the Indians. Of the first 40,000 college grads before the Civil War 25% became Ministers." (Rev. J. Farwell) Sadly, "the 'politically correct' philosophy of many campuses disdains Western Civilization, with its emphasis on Judeo-Christian heritage." (Dr. Jim Dobson)
My friend Bing is a college president and Philipono.  He said, "A major problem with Americans is that they lack an appreciation for education. America is the only country I've been to that has derogatory names for educated people. It started with egg head, then book worm, nerd, geek and dweeb. In Europe we call them scholars. They glorify athletes, who are entertainers." And criminals: O.J Simpson has become a much bigger celebrity since murdering his x-wife, Nicole Brown and her boyfriend Ron Goldman. Books were written and movies are made about criminals for years. It the 1930's it was Bonnie and Clyde and John Dillenger.
Today it is Amy Fisher who attempted to murder Mary Jo Butafucko, her lover, Joe's wife, with a bullet in the neck. Luckily, Mary survived and Amy is in jail. But three movies were made about it! A movie was made about O.J. Simpson and he wrote a book.   One was made about a male cadet in the Air Force who conspired with his girlfriend, a Navy Cadet to kill a woman he had a one night stand with.

 ART
Conservatives are often accused by some Liberals of censorship. Yet millions of tax dollars are given away in grants to the National Endowments for the Arts, public t.v., painters, photographers and sculptors. Federal education grants have been cut 50% for the 1993-94 school year because of the recession. Last year, an artist painted a picture of Jesus on the Cross in a jar of urine.  Isn't this sacrilege? Winthrop, a photographer displayed a photo of a sculpture of a man putting a bull whip up another man's anus. Is this art? Should tax dollars be funding this "art"? Perhaps we should reevaluate the funding of the National Endowments for the Arts by tax payers? With a recession on I wonder if there is a more needy cause?
   PUBLIC INTEREST GROUPS
Liberalism also incorporates non profit groups like the N.Y. and California Public Interest Research Groups. NYPIRG says, "We were founded by students like CUNY Vice-chancellor Jay Hershenson, at Queens and Syracuse Colleges in 1974. They were inspired by Ralph Nader after reading his book Action For A Change. In it he outlined a Public Interest Research Group. We are N.Y.S.'s main consumer and environmental advocacy organization. We are a non-partisan, non-profit group established to effect real political reforms while training students and other citizens to be advocates. Since 1973, we have played the key role in fighting for more than 100 pieces of consumer and environmental legislation or executive orders. We run a network of college campus chapters as well as several regional offices, a CITIZEN OUTREACH PROGRAM and a FUEL BUYERS GROUP.

"Our 19 college campus chapters provide a tremendous amount of NYPIRG's energy, resources and direction. Each campus chapter consists of either one or two f/t coordinators, several student chapter leaders and many volunteers: Students at NYPIRG chapters work on projects which support NYPIRG's statewide legislative agenda and projects which focus on local issues and services. NYPIRG's Board of Directors consists exclusively of students elected from these campus chapters.
"NYPIRG: The main office in N.Y.C. is on nine Murray St., 212- 349-6460, a f/t lobbying office in the state capitol and a regional organizing office in Huntington, N.Y. Our professional staff does studies on many topics, coordinates statewide campaigns, lobbies public officials and works with students.
"In addition, NYPIRG's OUTREACH PROGRAM travels to communities across N.Y. to inform citizens about consumer and environmental issues, encouraging them to take action and to gather their support. Our growing citizen membership currently exceeds 60,000 people. The Fuel Buyers Group offers our members an opportunity to buy home heating oil at discounted prices through the power of group buying. The Fuel Buyers Group also works to promote home insulation and energy conservation and to explore alternative energy use in N.Y.S.

"Some of the issues we are involved in are the ENVIRONMENT: For more than a decade, NYPIRG's Toxics Project has researched environmental problems and worked for solutions. The Toxics Project has written and otherwise helped to pass a variety of environmental laws, including the Bottle Law, the Enforcement Quality Bond Act of 1986 and the Toxic Victims Access to Justice Law. The project has recently launched a Waste Reduction And Packaging (WRAP) campaign to reduce garbage production in our state and country and is also leading the fight in N.Y.S. against incineration and in support of comprehensive recycling. Recent Toxins Project studies include "No Time To Waste" and "Plagued By Packaging."
"CONSUMER PROTECTION: NYPIRG is widely recognized as a strong voice for consumer rights in N.Y.S. Over the years, we've worked successfully for reforms such as the generic drug law, the new and used car lemon and item pricing law. We continue to advocate for banking, utility and other consumer protection laws.
"STRAPHANGERS CAMPAIGN: It fights for a cleaner, safer and more reliable N.Y.C.M.T.A. as a way of reducing N.Y.'s severe air pollution and improve the quality of life for N.Y. in general.

"EDUCATION WATCH: works to reform standardized testing practices and scholarship policies throughout N.Y.S. by working with local community groups and lobbying in Albany, N.Y. It also publishes studies on race and gender bias in these tests. It is currently to eliminate standardized testing in k-2nd grade.
"GOOD GOVERNMENT: It monitors the actions -and inactions -of N.Y.C.'s newly empowered legislature through its Council Watch news letter and advocates for campaign finance, ethics and other government reforms at city and state levels.  We also register thousands of voters across the state each year and lobby for changes in N.Y.'s election laws.
"SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACTION CENTERS: Across N.Y., these centers, directed by a NYPIRG staff attorney, train students to offer advice to citizens embroiled in the small claims court system. SCCAC volunteers also aid citizens with general consumer problems.
"NYPIRG's MAJOR VICTORIES: In addition to countless studies, rallies, legal actions and other community services, we have played the key role in fighting for more than 100 pieces of consumer and environmental legislation or executive orders.  Here are a few highlights of our victories.
"1990- We won passage of a law mandating the recycling of hazardous chlorofluorocarbons and expansion of credit card and lemon law protections.  We also helped organize Earth Day in N.Y., coordinating 3,000 volunteers to lead the largest environmentalist demonstration ever.      
"1989- A 2- year ban on selling irradiated foods, a law restricting smoking in public places, the Item Pricing Law extended, and the Maternity Information Law.  We also stopped a bill which would have let state agencies site incinerators and other projects with no regard to community opposition.
"1988- Got a federal law passed limiting the amount of days that banks can place holds on checking accounts. The bottle bill law was expanded to include wine coolers. We helped persuade Governor Cuomo to veto legislation which might have increased milk prices.
"1987- Legislation is passed to LOWER CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATES and stricter financial disclosure by state and county officials.
"1986- THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOND ACT: provided $1.2 billion for toxic dump clean up, and legislation allowing victims of toxic exposure the right to sue for damages.
"1985- Money is increased for toxic dump clean up. We defeated a bill which would have restricted the rights of medical malpractice victims.
"1984- The nation's first mandatory SEAT BELT LAW is passed as a result of NYPIRG's efforts.

"1983- THE LEMON LAW: requires manufacturers to replace or refund money for defective vehicles.  Community Right to Know:
Executive Order requiring the disclosure of corporate dumping practices.
"1982- THE BOTTLE RETURN LAW: establishes a 5-cent deposit on cans and bottles of beer and soda is adopted after a 10- year campaign.    
"1981- We secured passage of a UTILITY BILL OF RIGHTS: provides utility users with various protection.
"1980- The PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION LAW: allows consumers to sue businesses for false advertising is passed.
"1979- The TRUTH IN TESTING LAW: requires disclosure by standardizing test manufacturers and several Small Claims Court reforms are enacted.
"1978- We defeated product liability legislation that would have limited consumers' rights to monetary damages for injuries caused by defective products.
"1977- The GENERIC DRUG LAW: allows substitution of generic for brand name drugs. The Plain English Law: requiring all contracts for goods and services under 50,000 be written in non-technical words. The Home Insulation and Energy Conversation Act (HIECA) are passed.

"1976- We won passage of the ITEM PRICING LAW: requires most foods sold in stores to bear price tags, and established SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACTION CENTERS to COUNSEL CONSUMERS on their legal rights.
"1975- The HEARING AID SALES PRACTICE ACT: requires prescriptions for the sale of hearing aids to prevent consumer fraud is adopted.  We sued to halt pay bonuses to state legislators.
"1974- The FREEDOM of INFORMATION LAW opens official records for public access and one of three NYPIRG government reform bills passed this year.
"We have offices and collect $3 of student activity fees on most CUNY Campuses.  We annually post signs offering to refund it to those wanting it. We often sponsor letter writing and phone call programs to fight things like the transit fare hike in N.Y.C. and rent buses to take students up to Albany, N.Y. to protest tuition hikes for C.U.N.Y. and S.U.N.Y.  We also have free advice for small claims courts and offer internships where legal studies majors work and get college credit for their time."  (NYPIRG)

CALPIRG: is actively involved in issues like protecting spotted owls in California and the ozone. They claim to be non- partisan.  Yet they are always involved in Liberal causes like this. As for the Education Watch, many debate it.  Standardized tests discriminate against people of poverty to some degree and that is labeled racism.  Questions like does a spoon go with a cup and does cup go with a saucer are called racist. Don't blacks eat with utensils like whites or do they use their fingers instead of silverware?
NYPIRG is under constant pressure to submit itemized budgets for each CUNY campus they are on. They must be funded by a referendum and many students oppose them.
 RADICAL GROUPS
A less known Liberal group is "The Christic Institute: a law firm with investigators, community organizers, civil rights activists and peace advocates.  We were founded when their General Counsel Dan Sheenen filed a lawsuit against the Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation for radio active contamination on behalf of a former employee: Karen Silkwood.  Sara Nelson is executive director.  We do investigative research and file lawsuits on behalf of the public like the families of civil rights demonstrators who were shot by members of the American Nazi party and the K.K.K.  But only pursue cases whose verdicts they feel will result in a major precedent, like the Iran-contra scandal.  We're based in Washington D.C. and have an L.A. office.  We sell a Convergence newsletter: an affidavit on Iran-gate by Dan Sheenan outlining the history and activities of the secret team for $10 each, a La Penca Report by journalists Tony Avirgan and Martha Honey plaintiffs for the C.I. exposing the story behind the bombing of a contra hideout in La Penca, Nicaragua on 5/30/84 where 8 people, including a U.S. journalist died and 28 others were injured.  We request donations of $50, $100, $250, or whatever one can afford." (Cristic Institute)  "Bruce Springstein did a benefit concert for them a few years ago.  They are an anti-American law firm hired by Perot to investigate Bush and his family in 1988.  But could not find any wrong doings." (Rush Limbaugh)
 GAYS & BLACKS
"Many Liberals believe in 'political correctness': affirming that homosexuality is an acceptable alternate life style." (Jerry Farwell)
Certain Liberals say gays' civil rights are being violated like the blacks in the military and civilian life.  Slavery was not abolished until the Civil War ended in 1865 and the 13th amendment was written: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the U.S., or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Blacks were not granted voting rights until the 15th amendment was passed in 1870: "The rights of citizens of the U.S. to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the U.S. or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."  But blacks still could not vote in the South without paying a poll tax until the 24th amendment outlawed it in 1964.
On 7/26/48, President Truman signed a bill desegregating blacks in the military. They were segregated from public schools until 1954, when Brown versus the Board of Education proved that it violated the 14th amendment.  It was ratified in 1866, stating "All persons born or naturalized in the U.S., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the U.S. and of the state wherein they reside.  No state shall make or enforce any law which the privileges, or immunities of citizens of the U.S.; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."  The Supreme Court said that "Separate could not be equal in education or anything else."  They therefore ruled it unconstitutional.
Not until the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, was segregation of blacks in public places outlawed. Up until the Jones v. Mayer decision created the Open Housing Act of 1968 outlawing discrimination against blacks in the sale or renting of housing were they granted equal housing opportuny under law. Sadly, it took a century after slavery was abolished and 20 years after W.W. 2 for the Jim Crow Laws on segregation to be repealed and blacks gain equality under the law. That does not eliminate their persecution by groups like the Ku Klux Klan.

Have gays ever been denied these rights by law, like blacks? "The main purpose of the military is to kill people & break things." (R. Limbaugh) It’s a necessary evil. We must fight fire with fire. Unfortunately, it’s a cold cruel world in which democracy & freedom have many enemies. We defeated the Soviet Union to become a shining symbol of freedom, but new enemies constantly rise up to challenge us as the leader of the free world. Reality dictates that, "the price for freedom is eternal vigilance."(Ben Franklin) We must be ready to meet all challenges head on with an efficient military that is a well oiled machine. We should make love, not war, but be prepared for both!

Some Liberals are gay & say that their rights are being violated by banning them in the military. Is it discrimination?  Should sick people be permitted to enter the military? It's not a question of their ability to do their job. It’s one thing if they stay in the closet & another if they want to be openly gay. Pres. Clinton considered a separate platoon of gays to satisfy all. But, compromised by adopting Congressman (D) Massachusetts, Bernard Frank's idea of don’t-ask, tell, or investigate off duty, or base activities. That sounds like a fair compromise, but it’d discriminate against heterosexuals if their off duty & base sexual activities are investigated. If they aren't then we would never have known about Operation Sea Hook: the U.S. Navy investigated charges of sexual harassment & rape by several officers at an off duty and base party with prostitutes.  Upon concluding the investigation several officers were court- marshaled & dismissed, or resigned from the Navy. "The military is not the place for social experimentation!" (General Colin Powell)

Wouldn't it undermine the purpose of the military in several ways?  1) There'd be dissension among the ranks because many straight people would feel uncomfortable living with open gays, therefore discouraging heterosexuals from joining.  2) Wouldn't it defeat the purpose of segregating the sexes.  3) Gays have a much higher risk of contracting AIDS and since the military provides free lifetime health care for soldiers the cost to the taxpayers would be astronomical.  4) The military would be pressured to recognize gay marriages as legal as states like N.Y. do.  5) The military would then be required to grant all the benefits of marriage to gay marriages.  6) Gay couples will want to be able to adopt kids in the military like straight couples.
A survey was taken to by the Rush Limbaugh T.V. show to discover gay American's reaction to President Clinton's Don't Ask, Or Tell policy toward gays in the military. The responses from them were, "It is a real sell out. If we are not free to be who we are, or ought to be, we are not really free." "It's a real sellout to the moral majority and mainstream. It's his way of compromising to the status quo." "You should be able to serve in the military whether you are gay, straight, or by. It shouldn't matter.  It's a cop out and very impressive for him as a president."  "He was elected by gays and won closely in several states and now he is totally selling out.  We voted for him because we thought he supported our causes and this policy does not answer our needs at all." "I think he might be selling be selling out in that way, yes. But I think he can do better. I have faith that he'll come up with something better." "He said he supported a bill to lift the ban and now he is retreating due to conservatives’ opposition." "He 'talked the talk', but couldn't 'walk the walk,' and we are still putting up with that. Hopefully we'll be rid of him soon." During the election a survey was conducted by the Democrats showing that "...42% of them surveyed said they did not trust Clinton." Obviously, they knew what they were talking about.    
The gay community's anger at President Clinton is justified because he wrote them a letter on 1/5/93: "Dear Friends, Inauguration Day 1993 is more than the swearing in of a president. This day is a new beginning, new hopes and dreams.
The gay and lesbian community has been in the forefront of creating this incredible change of not only a revived national spirit.  Your contributions and talents are needed by this country and administration intends to use them.
Hillary and I thank you for your part in this historic change and we're proud to join the gay and lesbian community in your new found hope.                               Best wishes, Bill Clinton."  
Another reason gays are upset is "David Mixner, a close friend of the Clintons helped raise $3.4 Million from gays to be the largest donator in the 1992 campaign."  (National Gay and Lesbian Task Force)
"The average national income for gays in 1987 was $55,430, almost twice the national average of $32,144, more than triple the $17,939 for Hispanics and quadruple the $12,166 for Blacks, all with 1-3 years of high school.  The percent of college graduates is 59.6 for gays, more than triple the national average of 18; managerial and professional jobs for gays is 49, more than triple the national average of 15.9; overseas travel was 65.8, almost five times the national average of 14; the frequent flyer rate in 1987 was 26.5, 15 times the national average of 1.9%.  None were applicable for Blacks or Hispanics."  (Wall St. Journal, 7/18/91, B-1, polled by Simmons Market Research Bureau, U.S. census data, 1988 latest year available)
Unfortunately, gays are sometimes wrongfully bashed by others.  Does that make them an oppressed minority, or violate their rights any more than anyone else's?  Is comparison to the discrimination against blacks unfounded?  Haven't blacks have suffered demonstrable financial hardship due to discrimination as shown, whereas the average gay enjoys a lifestyle far greater than the average American?
"In 1988, a campaign in Texas successfully overturned Governor Neil Goldschmidt's gay rights executive order.  Supporters of the bill could not point out one case of sexual discrimination.  They are seeking to legitimize homosexuality by being granted a minority status from the government and gaining any special rights compensatory with it." (No Special Rights Political Action Committee)
The liberal media is a "museum of modern social decay." (Rush Limbaugh)  There are talk shows like Sally Jesse Raphael, Geraldo, Oprah, Donahue that are on at 4 p.m. daily.  Kids come home from school and watch a moral wasteland with things like moms who run off with their daughters boyfriends, teens who have parental consent to have sex in their room.  There is a lot to be said for "The family that prays together, stays together."
The welfare system has done more to harm blacks than slavery, or the kkk.  It has allowed the government to replace the man as the traditional breadwinner by not allowing Aid to Families with Dependent kids to receive benefits, unless the father is absent in many states.  This undermines the family unit.
That was not enough and some liberals go further by trying to convince society that homosexuality is normal.  They implement their social messages into the story lines of movies like "Terminator 2", and t.v. shows like "Mr. Belvedere", and "L.A. Law".
On "L.A. Law", in 1992, a man was sued for damages for defamation of character for "outing" (publicizing a persons homosexuality) another gay man. The man's defense was that he did it to show kids that being gay was normal; that they could grow up to be a dr., or lawyer, just like anyone else, also that, even if they were gay, there was nothing wrong with them. They can be a dr. or lawyer, but are abnormal!
Liberalism says homosexuality is a preference, a matter of personal choice, and natural not only as a lifestyle, but as a means of defining yourself as a person.  Is sexuality the only way of defining people? Isn't that like defining people as a smoker or non-smoker, alcoholic or non-alcoholic?  Some gays feel the need to have an annual gay pride parade, or march in the Ancient Order of Hybernians St. Pat's Day parade in N.Y.C. in order to tell the world that they are gay.  There is an annual "gay olympics" in N.Y.C.  Heterosexuals do not need, or desire to carry banners announcing their sexuality, hold "straight olympics", or
define themselves by their sexuality.  Why do gays?

Is it a freak of nature or just an alternate life style? It is a perversion, sexual dysfunction as much as bi-sexuality, pedophilia, sadism, masochism, or bestiality, birth defect, counterculture and disease, like alcoholism. The pieces do not fit. You can't fit a square peg in a round hole no matter how hard you try. It was not meant to be in the first place. There are none in the second. If it was meant to be, we'd all be physically identical & lesbians wouldn't need artificial insemination to conceive.

Many liberals being "politically correct" affirm that homosexuality is an acceptable alternative lifestyle.  They try to justify and rationalize it by saying being gay is as natural as being straight, it feels good and therefore there is nothing wrong with it.  It is not immoral and should not be illegal.  And by drawing upon the historical perspectives of it being around for centuries, God made them gay, animals are gay too, or they were born gay, or it is genetic.  "Just because something feels natural or good, does not mean that it is right. Adultery feels good, that does not make it right." (Dahoud Ibraham)  War, murder, rape and robbery have been around for centuries.  Does that make them normal, right, or moral?  Centuries ago the Bible said, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." (Leviticus, 18:22)  Couldn't it be a birth defect?  "Being gay is unnatural because an egg needs a sperm to fertilize it, as a seed needs to be nourished by Mother Earth to grow." (Ralph Domingo, 7/04/94)

Gays are still human, entitled to LIVE and LET LIVE as much as anyone else.  They should not be targets of fear, persecution, or discrimination because they are gay.  What consulting adults do behind closed doors is no one else's business.  They are looking for love in the wrong places. And need psychological, psychiatric and especially spiritual counselling to rehabilitate.  Hate the sin, but love the sinner. "No one should be expected to apologize for being straight." (Steven Soyfer)  Should people's sexual preferences be private, personal matters, or worn upon their sleeve as a badge of honor? In other words, DON'T ASK OR TELL!
PROPAGANDA in MOVIES and T.V.

In the movie "Terminator 2", we see what the writer thought would result from a nuclear war.  He opposed the arms race.  Despite the fact that some Liberals feel that "the collapse of Communism is not necessarily the vindication of Capitalism." (Collapse of Communism, Washington Post, 3/14/90)  I, on the other hand, believe in Reagan's philosophy of peace through strength.  And believed Gorbachev and the K.G.B. when they said so to.  The bottom line is "we had the food and they could not eat bullets." (Jim Ledi)  Unlike many liberals, who sometimes have a problem facing the fact that Liberalism is a failure and Reagan really was not just an excellent presidents, not just one of the greatest presidents of the century and but one of the greatest ever.  So they say dumb, selfish things such as, "yes, he defeated Communism and caused huge unemployment and a deficit which Clinton must raise taxes in order to reduce and I'd rather have Communism and employment rather than vice versa." (K. LichtBraun)  In a rare moment of honesty and sanity they say things such as, "I'm sorry, I was wrong.  Voting for Clinton was a mistake."  (K. LichtBraun)

In an episode of "Mr. Belvedere" he was at a supermarket when two men were robbing it.  The manager hit a silent alarm.  When the police arrived the crooks took all the customers hostage.  They were making a list of demands and decided to say they belong to a radical environmental group they heard so much about in the media.  They felt that since that group got so much media attention they would be celebrities.  Mr. Belvedere then seguayed into a diatribe of how we are trashing the planet and must be kind to it for the sake of future generations. And how it is our obligation to preserve and maintain the planet.  Everyone was ashamed and promised to be environmentally conscious in the future.

Liberal 3

LIBERAL -3                                    CARTER V. CLINTON
Many Conservatives see several parallels in policies that propose larger government between Presidents Carter and Clinton like Carter's Energy Crisis and Clinton's Health Care Plan.  "1) Carter complained the U.S. was the only W. Democracy with out a national energy policy.  2) Spoke darkly about the power of special interests.  3) Hired Jim Schlesinger to help manage policy efforts.
4) Exonerated the oil industry for profiteering.  5) Warned that failure to pass his plan could threaten our free institutions.  6) Told Americans they use too much energy.  Carter proposed several solutions to the energy crisis 1) Taxes on gas guzzling cars.  2) Regulation of natural gas.  3) Wind-fall profit taxes. 4) Creation of a Department of Energy.  5) Standby tax on gas to be imposed if Americans use too much. 6) Tried to change American habits." (Wall St. Journal, 10/21/93, p. , by Dan Calf, Shades of Carter in Clinton Health Care Plan)
The parallels between them stop when it comes to being a moral leader.  Carter was a Born Again Christian and a man of character who set an example as a moral and spiritual leader for the nation.  Unlike Clinton he showed that character does matter.  Neither during, or since his administration was Carter's character ever questioned.  Nor did Carter ever need to disgrace himself, his family, and the presidency by creating a legal defence fund, requesting donations from Political Action Committees or the public.  It would have been beneath a man of his character.

Many feminists find themselves in the middle again: Ted  Kennedy is a known womanizer, but supported many feminist and liberal issues.  Clinton is also a liberal, but Paula Jones is a woman claiming a man sexually harassed her.  Not being a Yale Law Professor like Anita Hill and the man being a Democrat, unlike Clarence Thomas creates a conflict of interest for feminists.  Is any wonder that in a recent poll when asked "Is religion losing it's influence on American life?  65% said yes and 21% said no.  Should the president be moral and spiritual leader? 78% said yes.  Is God the moral guiding force of American democracy? 55% said yes.  Would our government be better if policies were more directed by moral values?  84% said yes." (U.S. News & World Report, 4/4/94, p.51, a poll of 1000 registered voters with an over sample 45 blacks conducted by Celindia Lake of Mellman-Lazarus-Lake and Ed Goeas of the Tarrance Group 3/5-7/94.  Margin of error: plus or minus 3.1%. Percent may not add up to 100 because some respondents answered "Don't know." Washington, D.C.)
Unlike Carter, Clinton deceived us by claiming to be a poor man when he came to office.  "The Clintons had assets of $633,015- $1,620,000 in 1993.  His assets are between $96 and $266,000.  Hers were $516,000 -$1.05 million Chelsa was $23,000-140,000" (Clintons' Assets: Up to $1.6 Million/ President At The Head of The Class, by         , p.  , USA Today).

An investigation of Mrs. Clinton's sale of Health- Care Stocks by the Ethics Office released their findings.  Ethics Office Director Steven Potts responded that "Mrs. Clinton could not have violated federal conflict of interest laws because she was not an executive/branch employee.  Her involvement in health care reform was too broad to permit her to take particular actions that would have a direct and predictable effect on her financial interest."
Judge Larry Silberman, U.S. Circuit Court, Washington, D.C. felt differently and said, "We see no reason why a president could not use his/her spouse to do a task that the president might delegate to a White House aides. It's reasonable therefore to construe the president's spouse as a de facto officer or employee."

Another difference between the two men is the kind of governor they were.  "Arkansas as Rankings, Look at what we have done. The 40th most livable state in 1992 and 13th in 1993. The fifth highest poverty rate with 118.4% of the population.  The 48th lowest median household income $23,435.  The 47th lowest % of population are high school grads annually and 66.3% of population.  The 46th lowest pay in 1991, $19,008. The 13th highest percent of people not covered by health insurance in 1991, 15.7 %.  The second highest unwed teen births in 89, 19.6%.  #5 highest death rate in 1991, 8.5% per thousand.  Third highest homeless percent in 1990, 9.75%. Highest divorce rate in 1991, 7.8%." (State Rankings 1993, a statistical view of the 50 U.S., #4 edition, Morgan Quitno)
Carter, unlike Clinton is a proud veteran Clinton's representation of the U.S. at the 50th anniversary of D-Day was an insult to every veteran, dead or alive, and every current soldier.  He clearly showed his contempt for the military in the letter he wrote to Colonel Eugene Holmes, ROTC Director, U. of Arkansas, on 12/3/69, saying, "I am writing you in the hopes that telling this one story will help you to understand more clearly how so many fine people have come to find themselves still loving their country but loathing the military, to which you and other good men have devoted years, lifetimes, of the best service you could give.  Too many of us, it is no longer clear what is service and what is disservice, or if it is clear the conclusion is likely to be illegal..."

Another difference between is that Carter was always taken seriously because he never discussed the type of underwear he wore with a teenage girl on national TV.  Carter had a fairly stable administration whereas "the Clinton presidency is in its annual battle against political meltdown- the accumulation of so many negative perceptions that the president's political effectiveness is again at risk.  Last year's response was to bring in David Gergen, now moved sideways to the State Department.  This year it's Leon Panetta as White House chief of staff, moving the Thomas Mclarty over as the president's counselor.  These are all solid changes that will give Clinton breathing room.  He should use the time to draw his political breath.
"Even Clinton's supporters are frazzled and frustrated by his roller- coaster performance.  They are puzzled why someone as articulate as him, with the bully pulpit at his disposal, has not defined key issues like health care and foreign policy.

"The simple fact is that he talks too much.  All too often, he comes off not as a head of state but as just another talking head.  He needs to learn when to shut up.  Clinton is a perpetual talk show guest who has appeared on too many TV shows, ultimately turning off his audience.  Many Americans see him and think.  'My God, he's going to preach to me in the middle of dinner.'  'Click' goes the remote.  The hardest language Clinton must learn is silence.
"The Niagra of words and appearances has diminished the gravity and authority that should separate him from other talking heads.  Paradoxically, he avoids speaking to the American public when he is attacked personally, like W. Water.  (When he finally discussed it in a calm and thoughtful way, the story deflated.)

"He is unlucky to have taken office when there is a widespread disdain for 'politics as usual.' Today a mere 20% of the people believe that government generally tries to do the right the thing, versus 62% three decades ago.  The public is hungry for a real government of national reconciliation to end political posturing, congressional gridlock and witless spin doctoring.  People yearn for an effective president.

"It does not help that the media coverage of politics has degenerated into the gossip, scandal and trivia of tabloid TV, whose purveyors see politics as a world riddled by corruption, sexual escapades, secret deals and personal peccadilloes- almost everything, it seems, except the real substance of government. This media change and the fact that the president lacks the heroic aura of fighting an evil empire have encouraged the public perception that the political class is full of wrong doers. There is a neurotic national appetite for 'gotcha' journalism. Allegiance seems only to be given to celebrities. No wonder it is hard for our public servants to find the high ground from which to articulate an acceptable vision for the U.S.
"In this media -drenched culture, Clinton has come across not as an authoritative head of state but as a talking head- a wordy and clever professional politician.  He gets little credit for his accomplishments- a legislative score card that includes several come- from- behind victories like his deficit -reduction program and NAFTA, and measurable progress on gun control and assault weapons.  He also gets little credit for current economic expansion because so many average Americans standard of living has not risen, and they are still economically insecure.

"Americans want political leadership and skill-and less preaching.  Clinton must show that he
can deliver on his promise of change and carry the Congress, ending gridlock. Americans want a president who can raise the right issues and defeat the powerful Washington forces clinging to the status quo.  (As for moral leadership, 'If people want a sense of purpose, they should get it from their archbishop, not politicians' former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan).
"Clinton has no substantial ideological or personal base.  Only a record of achievement- more beef and less blarney- will make Americans comfortable with his leadership again.  The next four months before the November congressional elections are critical." (U.S. News & World Report, The Sweet Sounds Of Silence, Mortimer B. Zuckerman p.68, 7/11/94)

                        WHITE WATERGATE & FISCAL IMPROPRIETIES
In 1978 they bought 230 acres and borrowed $203,000 with the Macdougals forming the White Water Corporation In 1980 Mr. MacDougal bought the Madison Bank and Trust.  He lent Mrs. Clinton $30,000 to buy a model home on a White Water lot to avoid laws preventing them from lending money to themselves or their company. In 1984 the White Water helped President Clinton repay a $20,000 loan to the Cherry Valley Bank and the Clintons illegally claim the payment as an interest deduction on their income tax.  They blame their accountants. Then MacDougal buys back Clinton's loan and hire Mrs. Clinton and her firm to represent their bank.
She then helps White Water buy a new piece of land using an illegal $300,000 loan.  MacDougal claims he shipped the files to then Governor Clinton at his Mansion.  The president denies ever receiving them.

Madison Savings and Loan goes bankrupt with $60 million missing.  MacDougal is arrested and in a conflict of interest hires Mrs. Clinton's firm for a suit against the bank it used to represent.  He is acquitted and claims the Clintons lost much more than the $68,000 they claim.
In 1992 Clinton is elected.  In 1993 his friend and attorney, Vince Foster committed suicide.  While working for Mrs. Clinton's firm he filed long overdue taxes for The White Water Corporation which contradict most of the established dollar amounts.  After Foster's "suicide" important papers were taken from his office.  White House staffers met with the treasury dept.  Attorney General Reno named a special prosecutor and the House of Representatives began deciding whether or not to hold special hearings and if so, what kind.  President Clinton hired Lloyd Cutler, an old Democratic hand to restore order to the administration.  The only people who know the truth are the Clintons, MacDougals, Webster Hubble, Margaret Williams and Foster.

"Democratic jitters. Another problem for the president is that the rest of the political landscape offers no comfort. While polls show Americans still share Clinton's desire to see health coverage extended to every American, the president's ability to muscle such reforms through Congress seems diminished. A CNN/USA Today poll released last week showed Clinton's 42% approval rating at a 12-month low, with only 1 in 3 voters approving of the way he is handling...important issues of the economy, crime and health reform.  'This is a real bugle call' says Democratic pollster Celinda Lake.
"The start of Whitewater hearings this week could further erode Clinton's credibility. Few observers thought the hearings would make much news-until the Washington Post reported that the general counsel for the Treasury Dept., Jean Hanson, said she was instructed by Deputy Treasury Secretary Altman to contact the White House last fall to update Clinton advisors on developments. Altman said 'I had no advance knowledge of any meetings that took place between the White House & my dept.'

"Democratic sources say Altman's diaries, which are bound to come up at the hearings, contain two entries about Mrs. Clinton that reveal her distress at the accusations about the Clintons' Whitewater investments. In one, Altman notes that 'HRC is almost paralyzed' with anxiety about the unfolding White Water story.  In another, the Treasury official says Margaret Williams, Mrs. Clinton's chief of staff, told him the first lady wants to limit the scope of the independent counsel's jurisdiction.
"What's more, rumors spread on Capitol Hill last week that White House aide G. Stephanopoulos, who is being questioned for his role in Whitewater, said he could not recall key events.  Responding to rumors, White House counsel Lloyd Cutler demanded that the Senate Banking start investigating whether such rumors were the result of leaks. And Stephanopoulos' attorney Stan Brand told U.S News that his client offered 'substantial and direct testimony about all the contacts he had' for more than two hours. 'If somebody doesn't remember anything, it doesn't take 2 1/2 hours,' says Brand. Never the less, White House officials will try to drive home the theme that the hearings are a waste of time."(U.S. News & World Report, 8/1/94, Stumbling into a deal, Matt Cooper & Steve Roberts, p.22)

"A new report again focused attention on the president's Byzantine personal finances. As Arkansas Governor in the mid-80's, he took out at least $220,000 in personal loans to promote pet legislative projects. According to Associated Press the governor's aides persuaded political allies and corporate interests to pay them off.  Although unusual, it is not illegal, the White House insists. But it gave companies like Tyson Foods, the state's largest employer (which gave $15,000)& TCBY (whose top executive gave $25,000) a way to support the governor's efforts beyond the $1,500 campaign-contribution cap.  It also fueled speculation of impropriety because Tyson received $12 million in tax breaks during Clinton's tenure.  Critics also point out that Clinton, despite a $35,000 salary and Whitewater debts, received unsecured popular loans-up to $100,000 at a time-from a bank owned by a top aide.  A former Clinton staffer, Betsey Wright, has sent transaction records to special prosecutor Robert Fiske." (U.S. News & World Report, 7/25/94, More on President Clinton's Finances, Chick Harritty, p.6)  
                                                 THE  HOMELESS
Many liberals say many Conservatives are heartless, so some liberals in Rio-Linda, Ca. felt it was humane to help the homeless by giving them new shopping carts with reinforced front wheels to absorb the shock of being bumped into curbs to transport their possessions. Others made a video tape depicting how to discern eatable from inedible food in dumpsters. This is horrendous! Shouldn't self help programs be started to help them get the hand they so desperately need to get off the streets? Their idea of aid is finding ways to live on the street more bearable while seeking government aid and various social programs to rescue them.  We must "remember that any government that gets so big that it can give you all you want, is big enough to take all you have" (William Miller).
A better attitude toward the situation is "of course we have to find a way to help them, but is it necessary to lie to them or ourselves about their own contribution?  Their actions often are responsible for their problems.  Unless we recognize and are honest about that, we are not going to be able to clean up our streets and help repair these wrecked lives."  (Rush Limbaugh)

                                           BILINGUAL EDUCATION
Some Liberals believe in bi-lingual education for immigrants. The U.S. was founded as the "New World".  A place for all to unite, and start- anew leaving their- differences behind. We are a nation with a common language to unify us. That is why it is the U.S. United we stand or divided we fall.  Immigrants have been immigrating here from all over the world for over 200 years and learning English too. In 1993, the N.Y.C. Board of Elections printed voter registration booklets in English, Spanish and Chinese.  All Americans are descendants of immigrants.  Why should we start doing things different now? If someone moves to a new country they should learn the language.  Are we really doing people a service by teaching them bilingual education?

                                      AFFIRMATIVE ACTION  
Some liberals believe in affirmative action to help minorities succeed. This is commendable.  But unfortunately it has now become a quota system.  The standards for medical schools and civil service jobs are lowered for minorities. Resumes do not list their race because it is irrelevant to their qualification. So why are qualifications rated by race?  When we are given things solely because on our race, or sex, aren't we saying you cannot attain their goals on merit? When going to a dr., or lawyer we should never have to wonder if we are being cared for by a qualified professional, or a product of quotas!  Affirmative action means hiring life guards who cannot swim simply because they are a minority.  In an attempt toward color blindness we've become color obsessed.
                                             THE MEDIA  
"Many liberals accuse the media of having a conservative bias and vice versa" (Rich Hanley, 10/6/92).  In an interview on Electronic media Emily Rooney, Executive Producer ABC World News Tonight said, 'For one thing, in assembling newscasts and "American agenda" pieces, we're trying to tap into a Conservative, heart of America perspective, rather than the traditional media liberal spin on programs.

"I think we're aware, as everybody who works in the media is, that the old stereotype of the liberal bent happens to be true and we're making a concerted effort to really look for more from the other with being ponderous and lecturing or trying to convert people to another way of thinking."
We would not have so many racial problems in the U.S. if not for demagogues like the Reverends Sharpton and Faracon!  And we would not have them if not for a liberal media pandering to them!
Now that Clinton is president the truth about the media's liberal bias is coming out.  David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values said in a N.Y. Times article on 1/16/94, entitled                   , on p.  , by             that "For liberals and moderates it is now o.k. to say some of these things.  If they'd have done that under Bush, they'd have been aiding a political ideology they opposed."
                                          ANIMAL RIGHTS
Among the liberal groups are animal rights activists who brake for animals, save the seals, protecting the whales, dolphins and owls while others promote, and condone murdering unborn babies.  Is an animal's life more important than a baby's?  Sadly, unlike people, animals often give unconditional love. While sadly, man still inflicts injustice upon man, has done so since the beginning of time, and will probably continue to do so until the end of time. But does this make an animal as important as people?
                         
                                            ENVIRONMENTALISTS
A liberal environmentalist group is the California Public Interest Research Group.  They say there is a hole in the ozone causing the planet to burn up in ten years, yet offer no proof.
V.P. Gore wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning book called "Earth in the Balance: Ecology and The Human Spirit."  He says auto emissions destroy the ozone. And that a volcano erupting doesn't hurt the ozone because it does not reach that high in the atmosphere.  "A volcano is much higher than a car, so how come a car affects the ozone?" (Rush Limbaugh)
Many Liberals do not realize that corporations are a necessity in the world and they are "an ingenuous device for obtaining individual profit, without individual responsibility." (Ambrose Peirce, The Devil's Dictionary)
They try to destroy businesses like the lumber industry in California and Oregon during a recession even though they know that there is a circular between business and households causing a total dependence upon one another.  They do so anyway because some people feel spotted owls need to live in 200 year old trees.  Who knew that owls were wise enough to tell a tree's age?  "No man should lose his job over a spotted owl." (Reverend Jesse Jackson)  Some say "The rain forests are not the only place trees are falling and just over 50% of our native virgin forests- remain." (Newsweek Magazine, 3/29/93, Just For Kids Supplement: Saving The Earth, p.6)

People often make these statements yet offer little or no proof. "What's a virgin forest?  There is enough identified old growth (unlogged for 200 years) to make a band 5 miles wide from the Pacific to the Atlantic Coast.  New England had more forested acres in 1980 than during the 1800's.  59% of the N. East U.S. is forested, even though the population density there is three times the national average."  (Dr. Dixie Lee Ray)

Celebrities like Shirley Maclaine are in the environmentalist movement too and say things such as, "the planet has its own ideas. It simply wants to balance itself. It wants to shake off the disharmony.

"The 1994 N.Y. snow storm forced some people to stay in their homes and reach within themselves, others had to spend three hours in a taxi.  That was the most beautiful mischief which imposed upon us.

"Maybe that phone smashed because you spent too much time on it, or the book case was left standing because you should read more.  If I found friends of mine were thinking of this.  They felt they had ignored the warnings of avoiding their inner selves.  When we abuse our inner conflicts, the Earth reacts.  This is a law, not a belief."

                                                      WOMEN'S RIGHTS
A small unknown Liberal feminist group is the American Association of University Women.  Their President, Alice McKee said, "We conducted a survey on sexual harassment with Louis Harris and found that 81% of students surveyed in grades 8-11 were sexually harassed.  We define sexual harassment as looking, touching, rumors, jokes, grabbing, comments, pinching and invading someone's space."  "Was that before, or after the N.Y.C. Board of Ed. starting distributing condoms in high schools?" (Rush Limbaugh)

It is a very sad state of moral decay we live in now that a teen girl can get an abortion without parental consent, but needs it to go on a class trip. That is an outrage and an affront upon the morals of every decent man and woman of this great nation and a declaration of war upon God.

Is it any wonder that the family unit as we know it dying, theology is fast becoming a thing of the past and we are losing a moral majority? The next step is the banning of the Bible. Reverend Jerry Farwell jokingly calls the A.C.L.U. is "The American Communist Lawyers Union", because they're liberals who oppose anything even remotely related to God, like opposing the Boy Scout oath including God and In God We Trust on U.S. dollar. They, like many Liberals and feminists admire & believe Anita Hill had great courage to testify Clarence Thomas sexually harassed her during spring 1981 when he was her boss.

No one questioned the validity of her, or her friends, or witnesses like Ca. Workers Compensation Judge Susan Herchner who said, "Anita Hill called me in Spring- 1981 saying 'My boss Clarence Thomas is sexually harassing me.'" Conveniently no one mentioned that they did not meet until the fall of 1981.  Or, that her defense for not reporting him was she feared for her job. When told that it was a civil service job and he did not the power to fire her she said, "I did not know that at the time."  When asked why she followed him to another job when he left. She said, "I was afraid if I did not the new boss would fire me and I didn't know that he couldn't." She graduated Yale Law School.  Yet many liberals delude themselves into believing that she did not know these things.

A major Liberal group is the National Organization for Women.  "They were founded in 1966 by Betty Friedman, author of The Feminine Mystique and are now run by Mrs. Pat Ireland, a self proclaimed bisexual.  They have nine regional, 50 state and 800 local groups of people who support equality in partnership and seek to end prejudice and discrimination against women everywhere.  They promote passage of the Equal Rights Amendment and enforcement of federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex, engage in lobbying and litigation and strive to increase the amount of women elected to office.  They publish the N.O.W. times; a bi-monthly- paper, local groups have monthly papers. The N.O.W. Legal Defense Fund and Legal Committee are sister groups.  The Legal Committee is the superseding group, was established in 1970 and is based in N.Y.C.  They provide legal-kits help educate people on gender discrimination and other legal issues.  Their goal is combating prejudice based on race, sex and statistics on legal, education and economic situation of women.  They do so by legal action, education and community based projects.  They sponsor projects on women's media, equal rights and a national judicial education program promoting equality for all in court.  The Defense Fund publishes state guides on women's legal rights, legal resource kits, education surveys, brochures and pamphlets on N.O.W. and sponsors annual conventions." (1991 Encyclopedia of Associations, 25th ed., volume 1, National Organizations of The U.S., part 2, sections 7-18, p. 1679, entries 10246-22289)

Some liberals feel that "there are two options for feminists: 1) Raise the status of women above that of non-human animals and work for the improved treatment of women. 2) To see the current treatment of animals as problematic for the condition of women, and to work to change both simultaneously.

"If one wants to change the treatment of women.  One has to be committed to changing the treatment of animals.  This does not mean only women should become vegetarians, but it does indicate that women who eat meat are then implicated in their own oppression." (Erin McKenna, Philosophy Professor, Pacific Lutheran University, The Observer, Central Washington University, 5/5/94)    

Unfortunately for the Lundens, newscaster Joan Lunden recently divorced.  Some liberal feminists were upset because her husband won alimony.  Why is it acceptable to them for a woman to receive alimony, yet unacceptable for a man to also?  He had put his own career on hold for a few years to be her agent and needs time to rebuild it.  He will get a few million dollars over several years in support.  We would think that a part of the feminist agenda is pushing women to be career orientated and that turnabout is fair play.  But it seems "what is good for the goose is not for the gander."

Unfortunately, some women join liberal feminist groups for the wrong reasons: like desiring to define themselves solely, or at least primarily by their gender, versus a human first and woman second.  Others are bitter and say things like we do not need men to oppress them and can get vibrators and not have to wash his dirty socks.  They speak of freedom of choice, yet support Hillary Clinton despite her ridiculing housewives saying "I choose to become an attorney because I had better things to do than sit home baking cookies and having tea." Isn't being a homemaker a choice? Isn't it a labor of love and one of the most demanding jobs a woman does? Not to mention an act of great sacrifice and unselfishness that she does for her kids? These moms know that "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the nation" (G.W. Griffin). And that their sacrifice all these years helped make us a great nation. We could not have done it without them. Neither, they, or their decision should be publicly ridiculed by other moms, especially by the first lady of the U.S.A.! Maybe she should get a real job: become a house wife, then decide.

A major problem with their belief is they combine secular-humanism with materialism.  Admirably, they encourage women to be independent self- sufficient adults who strive to be all they can be.  While this sounds commendable they preach achieving this goal at any price. Marriage and family are unimportant and undesirable excess baggage on the road to success for a woman of the 90's.  They are extremists who feel "you don't have to marry a doctor or lawyer, you can become one." (Gloria Stienem)  Shouldn't people be more important than money?

In a 10/93 Gallup Poll done for C.N.N. and USA Today, "48% of women think the woman's movement has made their lives harder than 20 years ago; 41% of men agree.  There's a margin of plus or minus 3%."  
Members of these groups claim to be pro-choice because they feel government should not tell a woman what to do with her body, Roe V. Wade is a good decision and that the federal government should fund abortion on demand. But have no say in what a woman does to her body.
If it is none of the government's business whether or not a woman chooses to have sex, or whether she chooses to abort an unborn baby, why is it then the government’s responsibility to pay for abortions?  As taxpayers whose tax dollars fund these things it becomes our business.  Shouldn't all taxpayers be entitled to a say in where there taxes go? Likewise why should the government increase her welfare payments if she decides to have another baby? A company does not raise an employee's salary if they have a child, why should the government?

They promote abortion as the choice and protest the U.S. Supreme Courts decision to instill a 24 hour waiting period before having an abortion as denying women their freedom to choose. This is done under a guise of equality of women. Some liberals say things such as, "a fetus undergoes various stages of evolution, starting out as a fish and evolving into a human" (Ed Koch). The truth is that "when two animals mate they create another animal like themselves. If two humans mate what else could they make but another human?" (Val Nash) I say life begins at conception & abortion is murder, except in cases of rape, incest, or the mother's life. The Sixth Commandment says "Thou Shalt Not Kill." It is ironic but "we are a schizophrenic society: in one hospital room a woman is having an abortion in the fifth month, while in another room doctors are working feverishly to save a premature baby..." (Mike Gallagher)

Furthermore, we fight for third term abortions, yet have incubators, neo-natal units, surrogate mothers, illegal adoptions. And while some people are fighting in court to legally murder their unborn babies, others are fighting to keep cadavers, in some cases pregnant ones alive on life support machines, some until the baby can be born & others indefinitely. Many parents fight to keep their pre-mature babies alive in hospitals that specialize in neo-natal care. Some people feel that "the debate over abortion isn't over whether or not life begins at conception. It obviously does, or you wouldn't have to abort it. The debate is over when it attains 'personhood', whatever that is." (Tony Mancini) Others prefer to simplify it: "abortion’s like cutting your foot off." (Sid Zelin) Some people say that "people need to appease their conscience so they rationalize by saying things like it isn't a baby. It's a fetus, or something else. And since it isn't a baby, it isn't murder." (Carmen Valle)

Many liberals want the F.D.A. to approve the French abortion RU-486. They say things like if it is legal in France there is no reason why shouldn't it be in the U.S. too. They conveniently neglect to inform people of the fact that in France they ban post-menopausal women from conceiving through invitro fertilization because they are too old. Isn't that clearly a mixed- message. Yet many couples spend years on waiting list with adoption agencies in hopes of adopting a child. Others under go various fertility tests, try artificial insemination and some even resort to the desperate act of hiring a surrogate mother to have a baby for them when they can’t conceive. Unfortunately, Surgeon General, Dr. Jocelyn Elders does not agree. She said, "America's problem is a love affair with the fetus." There are allegations arising that she allowed defective condoms to be distributed to schools for fear that recalling them would have jeopardized the program when she was surgeon general in Arkansas.

In 1992, in Massachusetts, a woman took her husband to court to prevent him from getting a vasectomy; because she wanted kids and he did not. The judge ruled in her favor. Isn't that a double standard? A woman can do whatever she wants to with her body, but a man cannot. Isn't it wrong for the government to tell a man what he can do to his body, but be prevented from doing so to a woman?

FETAL TISSUE RESEARCH
Many liberals say fetal tissue research is a positive aspect of abortion. They also say, "the cells of a fetus are nature's modeling clay. Still waiting to be fully fixed into their strict biological as part of an adult's organs, they are blessed with an almost fanatical ability to thrive and multiply. To some medical researches, these unique properties hold the potential for saving lives now cut short by brain disorders, disease and injury. To other people, these same qualities raise deeply felt ethical questions about using the stuff of life to save life.

"These concerns led to a five-year ban on fetal tissue research. But now the- controversial technique is re-emerging from scientific shadows, raising once again the promise of cures for a many maladies-and resurrecting difficult ethical conflicts. Soon after taking office, Clinton lifted a ban on gov’t. support for fetal tissue research imposed by Reagan. The National Institutes of Health soon gave its unofficial stamp of approval: a $4.5 million research grant for studying the effects of it on brain -debilitating effects of Parkinson's- Disease.  And last month a bill was introduced in Congress to increase funding to study it and will probably funnel more money into the controversial research.
"Despite a ban on gov’t. support, private research has continued, revealing huge potential for reviving brain cells. Fetal tissue has several remarkable properties that give it a medical advantage over ordinary adult cells: They grow rapidly after transplantation & appear to secrete chemicals that boost growth, & in some cases there is no rejection as in most transplant operations. Besides relieving the symptoms of Parkinson's disease, fetal tissue transplants can aid diabetes, spinal cord injury, etc.

"Fetal cells' talent for prodigious growth may be a key factor in helping repair damage to the nervous system. Spinal cord injuries are incurable because unlike bone and skin cells, adult nerve cells do not re-grow. In an experiment, doctors- transplanted fetal nerve cells into partially paralyzed cats, resulting in some of them could walk again and one could even climb stairs. Researchers suspect that growing fetal cells may have branched out and merged with the cats' undamaged cells.

"Reawakening- the –brain: Fetal tissue's power to reinvigorate the nervous system is the key to curing Parkinson's disease. The brain cells of Parkinson's victims slowly die off, causing uncontrollable palsy, the loss of motor ability, but not intellect.
Unlike an organ or bone marrow transplant, replacing the dead cells with other adult cells is futile because they do not network.  But fetal nerve cells do.

"In some of the many Parkinson's patients who had a transplant in the past few- years showed great -improvement. They slowly regained some of the mobility thought to permanently- lost. Doctors believe in these successes, the cells sprout branches and join healthy tissue.
"The improvement appears to result when a fetal cell secretes chemicals like dopamine, which cannot be made by the inflicted brain, to help repair and replace damaged cells.  This may also help Huntington's- Chorea, a genetic disease causes muscle control loss and death.  Huntington sufferers also lose brain cells producing GABA, a vital chemical thought to aid in transmission between neurons. Apes receiving fetal cell transplants showed fewer- symptoms, maybe the new cells make GABA.

"Healing in the womb. Fetal tissue is also promising as a treatment for fetuses, especially for blood disorders. In adults, the progenitor cells are constantly made by the bone marrow, treatment often risky bone marrow transplant.
"But in fetuses four months or less, these cells are in the liver, so a fetus with sickle cell anemia, could be treated with a transplant of a snippet of fetal liver-eliminating the need for bone marrow transplant after birth. Researches in France have treated four fetuses with tissue transplants, in the U.S. a fetus with the rare Hurler's syndrome had the operation.  The child was born healthy and so far shows no symptoms.

"For all the promise of fetal tissue implants, scientists are aware of all the ethical problems arising from widespread use of this procedure.  A main criticism is that some people will have babies just for research- a currently illegal practice.  The best answer may lie in understanding why fetal tissue is special.  If its healing properties could be isolated and duplicated in a lab it would eliminate the moral and shortage problems in the long run." (U.S. News & World Report, 8/8/94, A tissue of promises, by Traci Watson, p.50)  
Many liberals would "agree that it is a woman's right to murder her unborn kids." (Rev. J. Farwell)  And are requesting millions of dollars in research for it?  Yet, have limited proof it can do anything.  Some people would have babies to sell for this research or have unprotected sex knowing if they get pregnant they can sell their babies for research.  "What about the pain the fetus is subjected to?  She has a needle inserted into the back of her head and her brain matter sucked into a tube.  This is done with only the mom getting anesthesia." (Dr. Jim Dobson)  Should an unborn baby be subjected to such inhumane torture, especially without anesthesia if we are unsure whether or not she
can feel pain?